Metaphysical naturalists may be inclined to suggest that they cannot be accused of question-begging in endorsing methodological naturalism, since this methodology is simply a logical extension of their metaphysical views. If one has good reason to believe there exist no nonnatural entities, then one can hardly be faulted for adopting a methodology which refuses to countenance nonnatural causes.
What this suggestion ignores is that metaphysical naturalists typically assert the truth of naturalism on the basis of Ockham's Razor. Very few naturalists are willing to argue that it can be demonstrated that the existence of nonnatural entities is logically impossible. Rather, they assert that there is insufficient evidence for the existence of such entities and that one should, therefore, refuse to posit them.
It seems, however, that the existence of physical events which are best explained on the hypothesis of a nonnatural cause would meet the requirements of Ockham's Razor and thus constitute evidence for a nonnatural entity. For the metaphysical naturalist to adopt a methodology which holds that it is never, even in principle, legitimate to posit a nonnatural cause for a physical event, is to guarantee that the requirements of Ockham's Razor will not be met. This begs the question of whether there exists sufficient evidence to justify belief in nonnatural entities and thus disbelief in metaphysical naturalism, since what is being proposed is a methodology that, by its refusal to countenance the legitimacy of ever postulating a nonnatural cause for a physical event, precludes any marshaling of evidence in favor of nonnatural causes.1
- ► 2016 (122)
- Answering "Why Does God Hate Me?"
- The Search for God is Growing-Online
- The Trinity, Firstborn, and the Dead
- Strengthening the Immune System for the Christian ...
- Who Counts as a Christian? (video)
- Gospel Variations and Ancient Biography
- Why Claiming Religion is False Undercuts Darwinism...
- Darwinism, Dawkins, and Complex Designers
- Gentile Forgiveness on the Jewish Holiest Day?
- Answering Questions as God's Herald
- To Draw Close to God You'll Need Theology (video)
- Talking with Mormons: When Beliefs Contradict Them...
- Those Guilty of Doing Nothing in the Face of Evil
- Sharing Absolute Truth with a Relativist
- Rebelling Against the Lovable Lothario
- Is Methodological Naturalism Question-Begging?
- Defining What It Means To Be A Christian (video)
- The Consequences of Beliefs
- Why Claiming “Belief is a Psychological Crutch” Ba...
- Sex, Sin, and Christian Hypocrites
- Defending the Trinity Against World Religions (pod...
- Top Five Apologetics Blog Posts for August
- Identifying Impostor Christianity: The Danger Of B...
- There's Only One Reason to Hold Any Belief
- How Christianity Lifts Cultures Out of Poverty
- If You're Skeptical of Miracles, Then Why Not Mora...
- The Inherent Bias in Science
- ▼ September (27)
- ► 2014 (287)
- ► 2013 (141)
- ► 2012 (28)
- ► 2011 (25)
- ► 2010 (36)
- ► 2009 (11)
Come Reason's Apologetics Notes blog will highlight various news stories or current events and seek to explore them from a thoughtful Christian perspective. Less formal and shorter than the www.comereason.org Web site articles, we hope to give readers points to reflect on concerning topics of the day.
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Is Methodological Naturalism Question-Begging?
Get the latest news and articles delivered to your inbox each month - absolutely free!