C. S. Lewis had a great quote when talking about the followers of Christ. He
said, "God is no fonder of intellectual slackers than of any other slackers. If
you are thinking of being a Christian, I warn you: you are embarking on
something that is going to take the whole of you, brains and all."
I
completely agree. Christians today have accepted the secular world's idea that
somehow faith and reason inhabit separate spheres. The two are sitting on
opposite ends of a spectrum and the more one applies tools such as logic and
philosophy to his or her beliefs, the less and less they will be considered
faithful or pleasing to God. A bumper sticker that used to be fairly popular
summed up this kind of attitude: "God said it, I believe it, that settles it."
But nowhere in scripture are we commanded to approach our beliefs blindly. In
fact, we are commanded to do just the opposite. When Jesus was asked what
the most important commandment was he replied, "You shall love the Lord your God
with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all
your strength" (Mark 12:30). Tellingly, although Jesus was quoting Deuteronomy
6:5, He added the phrase "and with all your mind." Jesus said that loving God
must include developing the life of the mind.
This makes a lot of sense,
given how Jesus identified Himself. In John 14:6 He said, "I am the Way the
truth and the Life." Well, if we think about Jesus as truth, then we should be
applying reason and logic to our beliefs. Logic is simply a tool that we use to
find truth.
Part of our difficulty in seeing logic and critical thinking as
ways we can better love God may be because we think that such tasks are only
human enterprises, while Jesus is divine. Logic means works, while He is grace.
But if Jesus is truth and we can use logic to discern truth, then we can use
logic to see the reality of Jesus.
You may be surprised to find that out
that the implementation of logic is actually found throughout the Bible and
especially in the New Testament.
Jesus used logic and argumentation many times. For
example, just before He gave the command to love God with your mind,
the
Sadducees tried to test Him with a question about a woman who was married and
widowed seven times. They used a technique in logic known as
reductio ad absurdum
to show that their views on the afterlife were correct. However, Jesus capably
destroyed their argument and chided them, saying "Is this not the reason you are
wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God?" He
then give the command that we must love God with all our minds.
The
Sadducees were unprepared. They hadn't done their homework and as a result had a
mistaken view of God. As faithful followers of Christ, let us not shy away from some of the harder work of
learning and developing our minds so we can more completely love our God with
all that we are.
Home > Apologetics-Notes Blog
Blog Archive
Followers
Come Reason's Apologetics Notes blog will highlight various news stories or current events and seek to explore them from a thoughtful Christian perspective. Less formal and shorter than the www.comereason.org Web site articles, we hope to give readers points to reflect on concerning topics of the day.
Powered by Blogger.
Friday, January 03, 2014
Thursday, January 02, 2014
If We're Only Our Bodies, Life Is Meaningless
What is the thing that makes me me? I found an interesting comic on the
Internet the other day that does a great job in unpacking one of the problems of
the materialist position that all we are is the sum total of our physical
makeup. You can read the whole
thing here, (it's rather long) but I will summarize.
The comic depicts a day where science has finally invented a machine to transport objects instantly from one location to the other. Think Star Trek. Of course, everyone hails this great technological feat, but at least one man, the protagonist of the strip, is disturbed. The comic states:
The question of identity that the strip portrays is one that has a long history in philosophy, going back to ancient Greece. Known as Theseus' Paradox, it is usually represented as a ship piloted by Theseus whose weather-worn components are replaced one at a time until eventually there are no original parts. Is this still Theseus' ship? What if one were to take all those original pieces and reassemble them right next to the repaired ship? Which would properly be Theseus' ship now?
As the comic shows, if this is true then life can be seen to be meaningless. What one does doesn't matter since a real you doesn't continue through life, but a bunch of copies. When viewed through a materialist lens, there is really no meaning to life at all. However, Christianity offers an answer to this dilemma. The Christian view of humanity teaches that we are not merely the assembly of atoms. Human beings have not only a body but a soul, an immaterial aspect of ourselves that stays the same throughout our existence. The soul is not replaced bit by bit. It is fundamentally the same thing. The soul is our essential self. While humans are made to be both body and soul, it is in our souls where our conscious selves reside. Even when we sleep, our souls continue and we don't cease to be.
J. P. Moreland has quoted J. Gresham Machen who said, "I think we ought to hold not only that man has a soul, but that it is important that he should know that he has a soul." We can clearly see why it is so important. If we are to take the materialist position, we are entirely consistent to believe there is no meaning to anything at all and there's really nothing to live for. But because we are body and soul, God has given us real meaning for this life as well as for the next.
The comic depicts a day where science has finally invented a machine to transport objects instantly from one location to the other. Think Star Trek. Of course, everyone hails this great technological feat, but at least one man, the protagonist of the strip, is disturbed. The comic states:
The machines did more than transport people. They also killed them. Since the machines didn't use exactly the same atoms in exactly the same position, what arrived on the other side wasn't the original but only a copy. However, because the copy had the memory of the original's past, it believed it was the same person.The man is disgusted at the wholesale death that people were accepting for the sake of convenience, which he deems immoral. He eventually meets the inventor of the machine and confronts him on such wanton disregard for human life. The inventor counters by answering, "My boy, surely you don't think that 'you' are the individual atoms of your body, do you? One carbon atom is the same as the next! And your body itself flushes out and replaces atoms all the time, yet you say nothing of copies. 'You' are not the atoms in your body but the pattern of the atoms." The man realizes now that every day he awakes his atoms are different. He dies every night as he loses consciousness and a copy wakes in the morning with the memories of the past. The man goes into an existential crisis.
The question of identity that the strip portrays is one that has a long history in philosophy, going back to ancient Greece. Known as Theseus' Paradox, it is usually represented as a ship piloted by Theseus whose weather-worn components are replaced one at a time until eventually there are no original parts. Is this still Theseus' ship? What if one were to take all those original pieces and reassemble them right next to the repaired ship? Which would properly be Theseus' ship now?
What is the Essential Element?
Both the transporter machine and Theseus' paradox ask the question of what makes up the essential element of a thing. If we are only a pattern of atoms arranged in a certain way, then can two specific identical patterns of atoms both claim to be the same person? The comic assumes that our material nature is really all there is to us. Our consciousness and our memories are what inevitably come from a specific arrangement of those atoms. That means the mental reduces to the material, and you can recreate a consciousness by duplicating the specific material components.As the comic shows, if this is true then life can be seen to be meaningless. What one does doesn't matter since a real you doesn't continue through life, but a bunch of copies. When viewed through a materialist lens, there is really no meaning to life at all. However, Christianity offers an answer to this dilemma. The Christian view of humanity teaches that we are not merely the assembly of atoms. Human beings have not only a body but a soul, an immaterial aspect of ourselves that stays the same throughout our existence. The soul is not replaced bit by bit. It is fundamentally the same thing. The soul is our essential self. While humans are made to be both body and soul, it is in our souls where our conscious selves reside. Even when we sleep, our souls continue and we don't cease to be.
Implications of a Soul
The idea that each of us possesses a soul has incredible implications. It not only provides continuity in this life (I am the same person tomorrow when I awake and I am today), but it gives us an understanding that people who are born without things like arms and legs are still fully valuable as human beings because they do not have less of a soul. It helps us understand why unborn human beings are valuable individuals. It also helps us to understand that what we do in this life matters because even if our material elements are destroyed in death, our souls will continue on.J. P. Moreland has quoted J. Gresham Machen who said, "I think we ought to hold not only that man has a soul, but that it is important that he should know that he has a soul." We can clearly see why it is so important. If we are to take the materialist position, we are entirely consistent to believe there is no meaning to anything at all and there's really nothing to live for. But because we are body and soul, God has given us real meaning for this life as well as for the next.
Labels:
existentialism,
materialism,
meaning of life,
philosophy,
science,
soul,
substance dualism
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
2013 Top Ten Apologetics Tweets
One of the ways I leverage social media is to expose people to the wider views and issues that are being written about online. So, I use my Twitter and Facebook accounts to post interesting links or to start conversations about things that matter. (Not exclusively, mind you. If you follow me you may also get some personal updates or a proud photo of a family member.)
Below are the top ten read articles I linked to with an apologetic or cultural focus. It's interesting to see just what resonates with folks out there as well as what was hot in the news this year. Some of both are reflected below.
- Why do they always ask about rape and incest? http://bit.ly/Pr1jWM
- Roger Ebert Reviews a Tragedy: His Search for God http://bit.ly/Zlw5QB
- Supreme Court Decisions Cannot Define Morality http://bit.ly/12lwAtD
- The knockout game: reporting more hype than truth. http://bit.ly/18fF27Y
- Triumph of the vulgarians http://lat.ms/1aRYlyx
- A Tale of Two Hitchens http://bit.ly/1aXsmg0
- The Culture of Memes and Why It’s Ruining the World http://bit.ly/18VYVyY
- Family Says They Did Tip Gay Server, Didn't Leave Note http://bit.ly/1aRd0y4
- A Whole New Meaning to Sex-Crazed http://bit.ly/1hEJbFd
- Devastating Arguments Against Christianity (Courtesy of the Internet) http://bit.ly/16fDcRa
Labels:
2013,
apologetics,
Christian living,
culture,
Internet,
media,
year in review
Monday, December 30, 2013
2013 Top Five Apologetics Podcasts
The Come Reason podcasts have been a weekly staple of our ministry for years. They cover a wide range of topics and issues that help Christians to better defend their faith. This
year our top five topics really focused in on God's existence and His revelation to us. My debate against noted Internet atheist Richard
Carrier was one of the top downloaded talks,
along with the question of the origin of life, and how to answer atheists when
they offer objections to God's existence. Tackling the Issue of Homosexuality
landed right in the middle of the top five, showing that this topic is becoming
more troublesome for those in the church.
Here, in reverse order of
popularity, are the top five podcast topics of 2013.
-
Esposito vs. Carrier: Does God Exist? (Debate)
Does God Exist? Philosophers and theologians have written volumes on this topic, but it has become especially significant in our modern world. Can we prove that God exists? And what are the implications if God doesn't exist? Listen to this lively exchange between Lenny Esposito and atheist Richard Carrier recorded before a packed house at the University of California Riverside. -
The Origin of Life Requires a Creator
How did life arise on earth? What are the key elements we need to focus on when talking with an evolutionist? What questions remain unanswered? In this class, we will look specifically at the beginning of life and show why given the evidence belief in a creator makes the most sense. -
Tackling the Issue of Homosexuality
Homosexual activists continue to press a pro-gay agenda in politics and in our schools. Even many church-goers believe that same-sex marriage should be allowed. Are Christians bigoted? How can we discuss these issues in a loving and convincing way? Join us to find out. -
Answering Atheist Arguments Against God
Atheism has been taking center stage lately. Both the New Atheists and a cohort of Internet skeptics continue to raise objections that have caught the public's fancy. Are they right? How should we answer? In this podcast, Lenny will point out the poverty of atheist arguments. -
How to Know the Bible is Really from God
When asked why they hold to certain beliefs or why they feel acting in a certain manner is a wrong, Christians will usually point to the Bible. The Bible is the standard of our faith. Why should we put so much faith in a collection of ancient texts? What about the holy texts of other faiths? Join us to see why the Bible is completely trustworthy.
Labels:
2013,
apologetics,
existence of God,
Richard Carrier,
year in review
Sunday, December 29, 2013
How to Know the Bible is Really from God
When asked why they hold to certain beliefs or why they feel acting in a certain manner is a wrong, Christians will usually point to the Bible. The Bible is the standard of our faith. Why should we put so much faith in a collection of ancient texts? What about the holy texts of other faiths? Join us to see why the Bible is completely trustworthy.
Labels:
apologetics,
Bible,
canon,
inerrancy,
inspiration,
New Testament,
reliability of the Bible
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
© 1999 – 2014 Come Reason Ministries. All rights reserved.