The curious thing about these books is that the authors often appear to think that they are saying something new and brave. They imagine themselves to be like the intrepid explorer Sir Richard Burton, who in 1853 disguised himself as a Muslim merchant, went to Mecca, and then wrote a book about his unprecedented feat. The public appears to agree, for the neo-atheist books have sold by the hundred thousand. Yet with the possible exception of Dennett’s, they advance no argument that I, the village atheist, could not have made by the age of 14 (Saint Anselm’s ontological argument for God’s existence gave me the greatest difficulty, but I had taken Hume to heart on the weakness of the argument from design).He then goes on to show some of the foibles of each of the main contributors to the New Atheist movement. He notes, "One striking aspect of Dennett’s book is his failure to avoid the language of purpose, intention, and ontological moral evaluation, despite his fierce opposition to teleological views of existence." In other words, Dennett keeps using language of purpose and design in trying to sell the argument that there is no designer and no ultimate purpose for life. In a parenthetical statement he writes:
And Dennett is not alone in this difficulty: Michel Onfray’s Atheist Manifesto, so rich in errors and inexactitudes that it would take a book as long as his to correct them, says on its second page that religion prevents mankind from facing up to "reality in all its naked cruelty." But how can reality have any moral quality without having an immanent or transcendent purpose?Dalrymple notes that Dawkins "quotes with approval a new set of Ten Commandments for atheists, which he obtained from an atheist website, without considering odd the idea that atheists require commandments at all, let alone precisely ten of them; nor does their metaphysical status seem to worry him." Brilliant observation. He also looks at Harris and Hitchens with equal insight.
However, the most amazing part of the article is how Dalrymple compares the modern atheists to the writings of a forgotten seventeenth century Anglican bishop. He writes, "But looking, say, into the works of Joseph Hall, D.D., I found myself moved: much more moved, it goes without saying, than by any of the books of the new atheists." After quoting from some of Hall’s writings, Dalrymple goes on to observe:
This is the language not of rights and entitlements, but of something much deeper—a universal respect for the condition of being human… No doubt it helps that Hall lived at a time of sonorous prose, prose that merely because of its sonority resonates in our souls; prose of the kind that none of us, because of the time in which we live, could ever equal. But the style applies to the thought as well as the prose; and I prefer Hall’s charity to Harris’s intolerance.The article may be a bit long for some, but it is an excellent read, if for no other reason than to expose you to the writings of Hall! I thank Dr. Dalrymple for his care for the human condition and his honesty and clarity in one more problem with the New Atheist movement—for all their sound and fury, they fail at elevating the human spirit.
Image courtesy Richard001 and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
The "new atheists" maybe new to some people but I have been an atheist before Dawkins et al were born. These authors are only enhancing the idea of atheism. I'm pushing 77 years of age and since I was born an atheist and wasn't brainwashed by my parents,I have been an atheist all of those years. I have only attended church forReplyDelete
weddings and funerals.
I was a police officer in excellent standing for 30 years and have never needed god(s) to make my life any better.
Some day most people will think rationally, be less gullible and will realize that religions of any type are but a crutch to help them do what they could easily have done without their belief in imaginary gods. Religion has caused more harm than good and I could list all the ways if there was time. Hitchens has done a great job doing just that.
Lenny, I like this, I am posting this page on CAA. Maybe it will get your work some attention from the boarder apologetics community.ReplyDelete
Rick Schenker, President
Astonishing. Our fellow Aspentroll has been born denying the existence of God.ReplyDelete
I had the exact same thought Tonico. Well like they say, rocks and cats and babies...ReplyDelete
I was a born-again evangelical Christian for over 25 years, but the 'new atheist' movement spurred me on to learn more science (esp. evolution) to debate them. To my surprise, I became an atheist. It is the path of intellectual honesty.ReplyDelete