tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post765262793365901316..comments2024-03-01T07:35:49.740-08:00Comments on Come Reason's Apologetics Notes: What Archaeology Cannot Tell Us About the BibleLenny Espositohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04064209669748618955noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post-22024038870026975682014-11-05T09:28:44.659-08:002014-11-05T09:28:44.659-08:00Really? We're not talking about something that...Really? We're not talking about something that happened last week or last year. This example would be some 3600-3800 years old and been buried, subjected to erosion, burial, settlers who moved into the area and built in the place of the old city who would many times either use the rubble from the previous city or clear it away, and many other factors. Doesn't sound as easy as you make it seem. Lenny Espositohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04064209669748618955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post-60929138858807920532014-11-03T19:26:39.575-08:002014-11-03T19:26:39.575-08:00"was this building destroyed because of a rai..."was this building destroyed because of a raid, an earthquake or Joshua's march?" That's a much more difficult question to answer."<br /><br />Actually, it's not. There is very different damage on buildings from raids and attacks than there is from earthquakes. It's rather easy to know the difference. Facetious. As usual.Lunasmeowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01007809265894737510noreply@blogger.com