tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post2942554969301396804..comments2024-03-01T07:35:49.740-08:00Comments on Come Reason's Apologetics Notes: Should the Gospel accounts be taken as history or as propaganda?Lenny Espositohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04064209669748618955noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post-37346230399542779682012-11-04T18:49:26.623-08:002012-11-04T18:49:26.623-08:00"critics have treated the gospel accounts as ..."critics have treated the gospel accounts as guilty of being unreliable historically simply because the main message is religious in nature."<br /><br />Bad straw man you have going there:<br />Critics have treated the accounts as unreliable because they are inconsistent and don't agree with each other.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13040685921066225665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6805190.post-48607822483105326252012-10-03T01:31:02.376-07:002012-10-03T01:31:02.376-07:00Propaganda has a bad name these days, but taken wi...Propaganda has a bad name these days, but taken with its original meaning - "a writing written with the purpose to persuade towards a belief or action", propaganda is probably a good description of the genre of writing of the gospelsKarl Udyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11651510172951048219noreply@blogger.com